This story has to do with the mind of a technocrat and my individual journey that led me to make some sense of that mind.

Recently, I had an excellent discussion with Charles Eisenstein. We spoke about totalitarianism, bullying, and guts as a remedy to bullying. To name a few things, Charles stated something that resonated with me really highly —– something that most likely resonates with a number of us today. He stated that he seemed like his whole life had actually prepared him for this minute in time, as if prior to 2020 he had actually been practicing —– and now whatever was genuine. I believed, wow, that’’ s precisely how I feel!

Since the start of COVID, I’’ ve been seeming like my whole life preceding 2020 was unexpectedly helpful: my youth invested in Moscow, at the ruins of the USSR, my attempting to comprehend the generation of my grandparents who had actually been broken by the totalitarian system of their time, the dreams about robotics and business holograms in the sky that I had as a kid, my violent marital relationship that taught me about the expense of self-betrayal, my research study into Big Tech and transhumanism that I provided for years preceding COVID —– all of it unexpectedly formed and made good sense.

Those experiences —– a few of them unpleasant —– all of a sudden formed a mosaic assisting me comprehend the existing minute with relative clearness. I feel obliged to share my understanding of the mental force that we are handling due to the fact that comprehending that effective supervisory force can assist us withstand it with intelligence and nerve —– which’’ s what we require.

. Ray Kurtzweil: Joy! Pleasure! Machines and individuals Will Be One, at Last!

Here’’ s straight from the horse ’ s mouth, particularly from the mouth of Ray Kurtzweil, who is the poster kid for the technocratic vision and likewise the main ““ dad of singularity.” ” Publicly, Kurzweil upholds the belief that makers and people will undoubtedly and always assemble —– and quickly —– which the physical combination with AI will considerably enhance the mankind and promote our advancement gloriously.

Kurzweil’’ s other offering proposal is immortality– as in, we will live permanently, or a minimum of a few of us will. Provided the severe nature of his public declarations, Kurzweil personal views are anybody’’ s think. In the past, I utilized to believe that Kurzweil was primarily genuine when discussing his vision of the future —– however today I think that he understands that he is offering us a bridge. However, the act of offering this bridge pays him extremely well, therefore he maintains his marketing pitch, such as the listed below:

Way of the Future: An Inglorious Attempt at Formalizing AI Worship.

Another enthusiastic gentleman, Anthony Levandowski, previously of Google, reached beginning a main church of AI, called Way of the Future. He began it in 2015 —– and after that in 2020, he silently closed it, while directly preventing a jail sentence associated to a case of taken copyright for self-driving vehicles and pointing out being moved by Black Lives Matters as a motivation for altering his mind (things can’’ t get any weirder):

““ The very first church of expert system has actually shut its conceptual doors. Anthony Levandowski, the previous Google engineer who prevented an 18-month jail sentence after getting a governmental pardon, has actually closed the church he produced to accept a godhead and comprehend based upon expert system.“ “ As they state, sic transit gloria mundi!

.‘‘ Plug and Pray ’.

Before we dive in the nervous mind of a technocrat, let ’ s listen to the sobering and sensible words by Joseph Weizenbaum, a well known German computer system researcher who died in 2008, and who was credited with the development of the very first ““ AI ” program called Eliza. The program, produced in the 1960s, was an easy chatbot imitating a treatment session.

Weizenbaum developed it as a clinical expedition. To his fantastic surprise, individuals connecting with Eliza began responding to it in a psychological way, as if they were speaking to a human. Weizenbaum didn’’ t like that advancement and made it extremely clear that his program was simply a predesigned algorithm, which it threatened to ascribe sensations to it.

Sadly, a number of his contemporaries discovered the idea of ““ humanized ” AI financially rewarding and really appealing, and Weizenbaum was ultimately brushed aside by his passionate coworkers.

The declaration listed below is from the trailer for a fantastic documentary about him called ““ Plug and Pray ”: “ It is devastating that many my associates think that we can produce a synthetic person. This enormous rubbish is connected to deceptions of magnificence. Perhaps, if I had actually understood at that time what I understand now, that I’’d have actually stated, ‘ I wear ’”t like beingin this lot. ’ ”

. Man as an Imperfect Machine.

To a technocrat, a person is an imperfect maker, a modest meat bag that is run by software application, which is produced by the brain. The technocrat’’ s understanding of life is based upon an extremely primitive, direct vision; it’’ s devoid of spiritual secret.

The mind of a technocrat is stuck in a location where it can’’ t relocation past the mechanical concept. It ’ s nearly as if like he has actually never ever established an organ to sense or understand spiritual appeal, therefore he feels bitter that charm and attempts to ruin it in whatever, with cold-minded effectiveness.

Much like spiritual enthusiasts of the centuries past, who buffooned and knocked other cultures’ ’ spiritual customs, based upon their own sensory constraints, technocrats seem like they have actually determined the concept of human presence, that it’’ s a matter of time for the science to decipher the software application of life and develop it from scratch. They believe it’’ s inescapable, and they are making it our issue.

.Frederick Taylor and ‘‘ Scientific Management ’.

Technocrats use the concepts of Frederick Taylor’’ s clinical management to every element of human life, while seeing their fellow people as a resource to be handled with optimal performance.

Scientific management was an approach of commercial optimization established by Taylor in the late 19th and early 20th century. The essence of his approach was severe fragmentation and compartmentalization of the production procedure.

It needed taking a complicated procedure, simplifying into extremely easy jobs, timing each job, enhancing it to the optimum utilizing the stop-watch, and after that appointing each of those basic jobs to various employees, while firmly insisting that the employees need to just utilize the pre-optimized motor patterns and work as effectively as possible. Under clinical management, there was no space for employees’ ’ imagination.

Famously, Taylor’’ s approach was embraced– and improved —– by Ford who employed Taylor to assist enhance his vehicle production. Interacting, they had the ability to cut the production times and increase the earnings significantly. Obviously, what was lost while doing so was the innovative sovereignty of the employee who was efficiently developed into a human robotic.

To make up for the tension and psychological vacuum and deficiency that included the speedup, and to avoid what in today’’ s language we call ““ employee burnout, ” Ford provided competitive pay to his employees on the condition of ending up being a loyal robotic. No disobedience was endured. The ambiance of the speedup was represented really poignantly by Charlie Chaplin in ““ Modern Times ”:

. Seeking Total Control.

The force driving the mind of a technocrat is the self-important psychological requirement for overall control, integrated with skepticism for other individuals in basic. They relatively aim to make up for their psychological hardship.( In other words, there is no factor to appreciate their successes as their successes are based upon theft of other individuals ’ s right to free choice.)


The technocrats ’ desire to totally manage their environments is anxiety-driven. They merely can ’ t stand the sensation of unpredictability that features permitting other individuals ’ s subjective options to play any function. They wear ’ t trust others to do the best thing, just like an extremely unstable moms and dad doesn ’ t trust his kid ’ s capability to select carefully without guidance– however far less benevolently.


Their desire for control is extremely unstable. They are resting on needles, so to speak( a Russian idiomand a pun in the light these days)– and in order to moisten their stress and anxiety, they turn to attempting to execute their managing aspirations.


A rhetorical concern: Does Bill Gates think that our world can not sustain a growing population– and for that reason, he needs to action in and find a solution for it in order to avoid an overall collapse of the human civilization (since he is the male for the task) —? Does he think himself to be a hero and a saint?


Short response: I wear ’ t care whether Bill Gates self-identifies as a bad guy or a saint. No matter whether he thinks himself to be an effective bad guy or an effective saint, he has no genuine company in my relationship with the world– and while his frame of mind and his wealth permit him to de facto enforce his vision with force, he stays a trespasser as far as I am worried, and I wear ’ t wish to abide by his vision of my future.


Technocrats might believe they are the best of the best. They might believe that their dazzling vision benefits the world. Regardless of whether they thinkthemselves to be the good excellent men the bad guysPeople their thirst for total overall is a pathological, anxiety-driven expression. They can ’ t stand being reliant on other individuals ’ s totally free will, and so they aim to squash it, which is not existentially.

’. An Old Problem.

While the technocrats these days have actually lastly discovered their best supervisory buddy in the kind of AI– which they can have configured in any method that fits their interests, and after that pretend that AI is unbiased– their damaged mindset is an old one.


We are not the very first generation facing this difficulty, and we can discover a lot from the past. The Great Reset gave us by the technocrats of the 21st century is the exact same old effort at dominance, using brand-new shoes( or rather, brand-new digital boots).


One of the very best analyses of the underlying despair was done by Steven Newcomb , the scholar of theSystem of Domination. Steven is Shawnee and Lenape, and his roots permit him to take a look at the problem from a distinct viewpoint that I discover really smart and informing.


Among other things, Steven Newcomb takes a look at the linguistic distinctions in between the principle of nature-based “ independent and complimentary presence ” that was mainly common amongst individuals all over in the world for thousands if not countless years– in spite of the unavoidable flaws of the human condition and the presence of wars– and the fairly brand-new paradigm of “ supremacy ” which keeps that in order to be “ human ” or “ civilized, ” one needs to knock one ’ s spiritual and physical sovereignty and one ’ s internal relationship with nature, and send to a mechanical concept, the Machine– be it the state, an institutional faith,” a business council,’or a communist celebration committee( the latter’examples are mine). Steven ’ s work is important for the understanding of technocracy.

. A Sensory Problem.

I think that the genuine factor for the method a technocrat ’ s mind works the method it works is broken sensory circuitry. People require to go through particular experiences in order to establish humbleness and wonder– both certifiessorely doing not have in technocrats– and in their case, those experience never ever’occurred. They are metaphorically two-dimensional, do not have depth.


Thus, we can ’ t repair them, and it ’ s not our task– however it definitely — assists to comprehend their thinking so that we can safeguard ourselves from their recklessness as much as we can. Personally, I wish their recovery similar to I wish the recovery of all– however I accept myconstraints as far as conserving the technocrats. Most likely not my top priority!


As a fascinating visual illustration of this mental state, here is young Steve Jobs with a happy shine in his eyes, revealing the well-known 1984 launch of a Macintosh computer system. Both his statement and the noticeably odd “ 1984 ” commercial that he reveals to promote his brand-new item– where his computer system conserves the world from the bleak Orwellian future– deserve having a look at:

. Man Worshipping His Brain.

I ’d like to end the storyabout technocrats with an allegory that I composed in 2017 BC( prior to COVID):


Lord Brain, produce a lie for me, a lie appealing and so grand that it will be difficult to withstand.


The world as it was developed prior to me, feels all of a sudden dull. I desire something brand-new, even if it ’ s a lie. A location where I wear ’ t understand any other God however me. A location where there is no vulnerability, a location where I wear ’t need to offer or be grateful to any person, a location where there is no unpredictability of love however just predictability of ownership– of whatever and everyone, by me.


I wish to forget the world in’which I belong of the so called ‘ whole, ’ something that I did not style. May there be no roots, just Holy Innovation.’May there be no duty, just Holy Disruption.


May whatever around me end up being inanimate, and might I be – constantly caught in re-living my success,so that absolutely nothing advises me of what I will lose. And therefore, the ‘guy who’ requested for whatever to be inanimate– since just inanimate things can be owned– lost his soul and ended up being a robotic.

. About the Author.

To discover more of Tessa Lena’s work, make sure to take a look at her bio, Tessa Fights Robots .

Read more: